Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time sample.
"Awaiting EIC assignment" for 3 weeks now.
Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time sample " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. After all, all this work is mostly voluntary. What does it mean ? And what should I do regarding this based on your experience? Many thanks in advance !! 1. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. In case if it gets rejected after 8-9 months, it will add up to the chaos of the author. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Any I have two questions. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. After one week with the editor, the My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. This model can capture the diverse nature of reviewers and papers’ research directions and consider the influence of time on the reviewer’s research direction. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. The one month is 20 Reasons You Need to Stop Stressing About Awaiting Reviewer Selection Vs Awaiting Reviewer Assignment To learn more about the practices of these third parties, you can access their privacy policies by clicking on their names below. After the Editor in Chief assigns the manuscript to an editor, the next task is “waiting for reviewer assignment” by that assigned editor. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. Suddenly, the status has been changed to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for the second time. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". For a special section, each author can be asked to review 5 papers and each paper is reviewed by 5 authors of other papers. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. I will disagree. This change has occurred To check the status of your submission in our system, please follow the below instructions: Log into your ScholarOne Manuscripts account Click on “Author” Under the Author Dashboard Section, click on “Submitted Manuscripts” Here, you will s The "Awaiting reviewer assignment" stage can be a time-consuming part of the process, as finding suitable reviewers who are also willing and available to review the manuscript can be challenging. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I You can certainly withdraw the paper. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. As far as I know, the "Awaiting EIC Decision" status is the final time when the "Awaiting EIC assignment" for 3 weeks now. 您好，感謝您在我們的論壇上分享您的問題。是的，如果狀態顯示“等待分配審稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment）”，則手稿很有可能會被送審。 讓我們瞭解一下投稿之後，稿件的狀態是如何變化的。論文投稿後，必須先經過編輯篩選。 I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. " The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months . The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under thanks a lot. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores: One or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. Examples of reviewer comments can help! Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: 'minor revisions', 'major revisions', 'revise and resubmit' and 'reject' decisions. But today suddenly the status changed back to Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of The time taken for reviewer assignment can vary based on the journal's The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. Please explain why it is so? After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Another point to note is I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. If this is the 2nd scenario noted above--that ScholarOne uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor and will only be reviewed by the editor (after the submission of a What Happens to My Paper? - The British Psychological Society Page 3 of 7 6. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. The first status that I am getting is "ADM: Awaiting Recommendation" , just after the initial status which was "ADM: Waiting for Admin Processing". It might be good to wait, especially if the journal is somewhere that you really want to publish. e. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. What Right, so now you propose to try emailing the editor in chief. For one week, the status was ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. [email protected] Submitted my paper. It will be marked At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting I submitted my paper and it has a status of awaiting ae assignment for 5 months. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Does it mean the manuscript is already under Poloz The status tells you which stage the paper is in, please see the table below for a definition of what each status means in Sage Path. I am still waiting to get a response from the reviewer. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. 21, awaiting AE decision. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's queue for a few days or even over a week. Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. This change has occurred Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. 15-6. Reviewer assignments (i. From the author's perspective, the formal review timelines are not something to count on, because both reviewers and editors can mess up. The status of the paper changed several times. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. The time it takes to complete this stage can vary widely depending on the journal, the availability of reviewers, and the current backlog of submissions. What IN SCHOLARONE YOU WILL BE ABLE TO Search for reviewers both in the database and externally Invite and manage reviews Check the status ofANATOMY OF A MANUSCRIPT •Notes appear at the very bottom of the page. Your manuscript might be at the end of a pretty long queue that might take time. Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper I submitted my paper and it has a status of awaiting ae assignment for 5 months. I have previously published in the same journal I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Maybe someone is busy or on vacation and doesn't have time to deal with it for a few days (for example, the editor in chief may have to approve). Contents Examples awaiting reviewer assignment For more on withdrawing your manuscript, you may refer to this resource: Should I withdraw my paper if the journal is taking unusually long to process. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. What does this mean? Will it go for review? In this case, our advice to this author, which was passed via the RCP, was to wait for 6-8 weeks to hear back from the journal (based on the average time to first response stated on the journal’s website) and then to write a politely-worded email to the editor to I’m in the social sciences too and recently had a paper that stayed “with editor” for 2 months and then was out for review for 4 before I got the first decision. It is a typical example of an optimization task where limited resources (reviewers) should be assigned to a number of consumers (papers), so that every paper should be evaluated by highly Charlesworth Author Services 17 September, 2019 Peer Review Process Navigating peer review: Sitting and waiting – What can you do? What should you do? Congratulations! You’ve submitted your article to a leading international journal (hopefully with a high impact factor) and have checked your author area within their online submission system My paper underwent a revision. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is As can be inferred from Fig. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. The key input to the reviewer assignment problem is a paper-reviewer affinity score matrix \(S^*\in [0,1]^{n\times m}\) (we will also refer to \([0,1]^{n\times m}\) as the unit hypercube), where \(S^*_{p, r}\in [0,1]\) is the affinity of paper \(p \in P\) to reviewer \(r \in R\). Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Explore what’s involved here. Please help me out! I submitted a manuscript to a SCOPUS indexed journal some months ago. It has been 1. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. It has been a long time, If not, it will become "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" until now, and I don't know if it has been reviewed or not 2022-06-01 I have submitted my manuscript to a journal of repute. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The reviewer assignment is overdue because the three invited reviewers did not agree to review. This change has Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. A rather recent example: We yesterday received the acceptance for a minor revision we submitted 5 1/2 months ago. " That is a very fast review process. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. I am really Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. As the Editor has not responded to an email, I would contact the Editorial Office (or journal Admin assistant) to follow up on the 如果它符合期刊選擇標準並且是原創作品，那麼當編輯開始尋找審稿人時，狀態將從“編輯處理中（With editor）”更改為“等待分配審稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment）”。 Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Centers There are four centers at the top left hand side: Home, Author, Review, and Associate Editor Center Home: The SAGE Track home page that contains the resources found under the While we aim to complete the peer review process as quickly as possible, please bear in mind that reviewers give their time voluntarily. Now it is In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. My The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections: Review Settings Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. Is assigned to you tell me show on an ideal world, selection bias for. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. This change has occurred After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Today it went Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. I know the typical stages of a journal workflow. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days reflection. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. This change has occurred What does awaiting reviewers reply mean? And how long does it take Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. So, why has it returned to I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 6. In this pandemic situation, it's highly likely that the processing time will delay a bit longer than normal. Now, while the editor selects reviewers and the reviewers start and complete their reviews, you may wish to spend some time you What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. Figures - uploaded by Xiquan Zhao Author content All figure content in this area was uploaded by Xiquan Zhao My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. It's been over two months, and the manuscript's status is 'awaiting main processing. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. This decision may normally take up to 2 weeks. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. In other words The peer review process can be broadly summarized into 10 steps, although these steps can vary slightly between journals. Moreover, getting the right editor for your topic is also sometimes an issue. Maybe the I submitted a paper through ScholarOne Manuscripts 3 days ago. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! SELECT PAPERS From the Automatic Assignment Wizard page, you select the minimum number of Reviewers per Paper. So more than 1 month is definitely atypical, and you should write in and ask. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer Comment Or The most common form of peer review for our journals and case studies is 'double anonymous', which keeps the process as objective as possible. I want to know how long will this status last. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It has been three weeks since. You're at the "Editorial Decision" stage, and as you can see from there, the typical duration is a few workdays to a week. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? The status of my manuscript is "Awaiting AE decision", and it has lasted for nearly four months. Centers There are four centers at the top left hand side: Home, Author, Review, and Associate Editor Center Home: The SAGE Track home page that contains the resources found under the My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. You can first do this in bulk and then edit individual papers if needed. 26 Fill in the most relevant papers, which should be high-level papers that are most related to your field. The status of the paper was 'Submitted. What does it mean ? And what should I do regarding this based on your experience? Many thanks in advance !! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is also the time for the I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. How long time should You notice, however, that at the same time the next line appeared in the table, “Contacting Potential Reviewers. The reason this status You have three questions. The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but finally everything is settled before graduation! It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all along. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Review and selection of manuscripts All submissions will first be subject to an in-house evaluation process with respect to suitability for BLC in terms of quality, content and methodology. I have sent two pieces of mail to AE to inquire of the status, but I have not received any reply. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. I would That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or Depending on the journal, two weeks isn't really a long time for editor assignment. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. 6. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. Should I be worried? I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. This change has occurred I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry Research or another reputable, peer-reviewed, scientific journal? In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. Let’s take them one by one. If the article is rejected or sent back The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. While there has been much research on RAP, there has not yet Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. It went through all stages up to the Editor in Charge Decision. Is this inordinately long for this part of the process, or am I being If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. Sure. https://www Assume we have a set P of n papers submitted to a peer-review venue, Footnote 4 and a set R of m reviewers. Can I send a email to is over 2 months now, and it is still 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment'. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. I'm an Assistant Professor and I get far more review requests than I could ever handle, at the same time that my institutional service responsibilities are ramping up (fewer T-T profs around my In this paper, we analyze current problems in reviewer assignment system and further propose a time-aware and topic-based reviewer assignment model. ' A 2016 survey by Nature Research (see image below Note that as long as there are less than 4 agreed reviewers, this status will remain unchanged even though the Associate Editor has been actively recruiting new reviewers. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations Editor here. 5 months with no change in status. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. 2. What the best I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I did). ’ What does this mean? What would be the next status? How long should I wait for the change of status? I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript A reviewer assignment example of maximizing topic coverage of papers. ” This is one of those confusing parts of the system. There may be occasions where several reviewers are invited before the required number can be arranged, or when a reviewer fails to deliver a review and the invitation process needs to start again. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. But note that this is a busy time for academics, some of whom are the editors and certainly the reviewers. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for Using something named Google; "Awaiting AE recommendation -> The paper received the sufficient number of reviews (usually 2) and, on their basis, AE makes recommendation to EIC. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. To do it in bulk, enter the minimum number of I submitted a paper to a top journal last week. Has Dear Dr. Also, one reviewer may send their comments It's been only a month. To check the status of your submission in our system, please follow the below instructions: Log into your ScholarOne Manuscripts account Click on “Author” Under the Author Dashboard Section, click on “Submitted Manuscripts” Here, you will s What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. be patient for a little while more. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. If the paper is to be rejected Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that The assignment of reviewers to papers is one of the most important and challenging tasks in organizing scientific conferences and a peer review process in general. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. However, I definitely remember the last two: Manuscript has been “awaiting assignment” for 5 months! This is one of the very many reasons why academics don’t live longer! Reviewer 2 Must Be Stopped! | Manuscript has been “awaiting assignment” for 5 months I submitted my paper two weeks back. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. If you're wondering, there's a good chance 7 Welcome Page After logging in, you will enter the SAGE Track welcome page. So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. What does that even actually mean? Does that mean no EIC is willing to handle the paper? And how long before I write to them a polite email? Kindly advise. Ultimately, it took so long because even after finding reviewers one just decided to not review it (which I’m not I submitted a paper to some journal. But today suddenly the status changed I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. What can this mean? The platform is Check out this question. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation (), reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of Hi. Contact Potential Reviewer lists all manuscripts with invited Reviewers, not all of whom have accepted or declined the invitation to review. Is it normal? Also, I see that it's been a while that the status has remained at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Awaiting Editor Assignment is the most common status as during this stage we are inviting editors of journa I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). After making the necessary changes, I submitted the manuscript. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023 7 Welcome Page After logging in, you will enter the SAGE Track welcome page. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. ’ After that, and till now, it is ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. If you can’t be, which is totally understandable, just I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. •Creating a note does NOT send a After having a second thought, I am still a bit confused. Others will accept your work, and take forever I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. But today suddenly the status changed At times there is a long queue or these people are busy. I wouldn't worry about it: a few days is not such a long delay, and I doubt there's anything you can do to find out the 2023. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. One of my manuscript was submitted to a journal in one year and four months ago, and after two rounds of reviews, its status was changed to "Awaiting EIC Decision" two weeks ago. I submitted a paper to a journal. Awaiting Reviewer I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Editorial Production Assistant Processing The Editorial Production Assistant will carry out quality checks on your article at which point you may need to provide further information before your article is sent for Peer Review. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 Inviting reviewers until 4 reviewers agree. kptscszfsmlyeeblyrtvnmotwkvcwelxfwjiwfafzeynklohsynxvpgt