Thunderbolt 3 egpu performance reddit. I've looked at the ADT Link dock but it is PCIe to M.

Thunderbolt 3 egpu performance reddit Compared to a Thunderbolt 4 egpu case, and considering I'm going to buy the RTX 2080, do you think I'm going to lose in performance? It seems Razer Core X is super popular despite the fact that it only only does Thunderbolt 3. This laptop is great plus the eGPU ultimately was worth it and I can now sell my previous Dell G5 SE (4600h + AMD 5600m GPU) laptop. Also here is the link for the thunderbolt drive I have. Using PCI 4 GPU in a PCI 3 slot will affect performance in some cases/certain GPUs. The thunderbolt controllers often add latency. Its detected perfectly, however i notice serious stuttering even on the desktop. A "one cable solution" Thunderbolt 3/4 egpu, graphics card newer than >gtx1050/rx470 is to be chosen independently, however it has to be the same gpu conneted to laptop and also inside the desktop full PCIex16 Ram more than 8 GB Other specs don't matter that much for avg fps benches Thanks, I really appreciate your answer. if you have a 11th gen cpu, then the thunderbolt 3 egpu will take advantage from the cpu separates tb away from PCH bridge. "Latency" or over generalized overhead from being a non-integrated connection likely is. Hey all, not sure if I'm searching the wrong things but I can't find many comparisons for this Thunderbolt 4 increases eGPU performance, right? How would a Thunderbolt 4 eGPU fare against a laptop with a built in GPU? Which one would give better results? Say an eGPU with a RTX 2070 vs a Laptop that has a RTX2070 built in. io to see if anyone has builds for that model. Hello, I want to ditch my desktop PC for something mobile as i want to be able to connect to various TV/monitors in my house without too much hassle, the problem is well my "next" desktop PC would have a RTX 3080 or close to it and getting a laptop with it's performance would make my pockets go empty. No need to open the pc/cable hanging Cleaner look NMVE x4 slot accesible for SO I haven't done any serious photo editing so I'm not sure how much a GPU would help. Then you adapt that into thunderbolt, which supports a 3. With the eGPU setup, how much of a performance dip can I expect in comparison to my current PC with bandwidth limitations? I have a Gigabyte Aero 15x V8 from 2018. 5m one or 2. TLDR : want a test with benchmarks between thunderbolt 3 ice lake VS thunderbolt 4. 0 x 4 speeds, so as long as the GPU can provide that bandwidth (which both can) there won't be any relative performance loss difference, all else being equal. Cobble together a eGPU using the NVME SSD's M. 0 ASM4242 vs. Is it possible to update the output of the thunderbolt that's built into it? Thanks. I think the x390 series is only 2 lanes, but from what I have read it doesn't really matter if you plan on using it with an external display, it is more an issue if you wan't to use the display on the laptop while running in a loop with the eGPU. I found a used Sonnet 550 for 120€ but: Thunderbolt 3 Sonnet 550 Pros: Will work 100% chance More reliable, more stable, few errors. Apr 3, 2018 · As the title states. 0 was a double in bandwidth. Link to a good budget egpu. So i thought about an eGPU. 6 GBps in each direction. 2. Microsoft mandates that all external-facing USB4 support Thunderbolt 3. Might not matter as much on the egpu side as the improvements on the computer side which is why most computer uprgraded, accessory makers still use thunderbolt 3. You want the eGPU so you can do some "respectable" game on it. The comment asking about the bandwidth is exactly the reason why I asked the way I asked because most news gives the impression that Thunderbolt 5 performance will be better than Oculink but I don't know exactly if this is true. For last, i tried everything: Update BIOS, tried different versions of Thunderbolt 3 controller, different versions of Nvidia Drivers and nothing. In any PCI-E setup the weakest link is the limitation. The current setup is fine on most games but specifically for star The extremism on using desktops at home while using a laptop outside home seems very logical. For Example, Is there a significant effect between 1080, 1080Ti or 2080 over Thunderbolt 3? First off, use an external screen. A decent thunderbolt 3 egpu encloser can cost around $500 pair that with a 6600 or 5700 you have a good base system for anything. I'm well aware that my eGPU setup is limiting the performance of my GPU. Hey all, from what I know if a passive cable exceeds the length of ca. Under 500€ I’d recommend an AMD RX 6700 XT 12GB. The Ryzen 7 7840U is USB 4. Since the high resolution drives down frame rates, it helps the eGPU catch up close to desktop performance. will this works? if so, Do you guys have any recommended cheap enclosure that can fit RTX 3080? Looking to get an eGpu to pair with the Go, not sure on the video card, possibly a 4070 or an AMD variant. That significantly reduces the latency of taking to a TB3 device, and improves eGPU performance. Thunderbolt 3 or 4 eGPU enclosures? Hello, I am planning to buy an ultrabook probably acer swift 3 evo with i7 12700h with integrated graphycs and 16gb fast ddr5 memory. The cost-performance ratio is really bad for highend cards. The monitor supports 60Hz and your graphics card generates fps. 2 eGPU over Thunderbolt 3 (TB3)? M. When installed in most desktops, your GPU gets x16 PCIe 3/4 lanes of bandwidth. Thunderbolt/USB4 is the equivalent of PCIe 3. I switched from an egpu'd Vega 64 to a RTX 2080 ti, compared it with another gaming rig and the performance drop between both GPU's when in the egpu was both 5-10%, but since the 2080 ti is 30% faster in most games, I was still getting 30% faster performance in the egpu'd 2080 ti Vs Vega 64. I'm not familiar with the 30th anniversary model, but if it's got a thunderbolt 3 or 4 port, then it should be equivalent to adding a gpu to a pcie 4X gen3 connection That's not how Thunderbolt works. Most work laptops are only 60hz panels. 0 x4 The reason is that the eGPU performance hit is dependent of frame rate, so if a desktop runs 200FPS at 1080p, an eGPU won't be typically close. Thunderbolt is more expensive. There have been decent experiments with desktops and laptops with the same specs compared to each other to show this. Recently I came across a Thunderbolt 3 eGPU on AliExpress manufactured under the name Wikingoo. 0 x 4 gives about 3. But if the desktop gets 60FPS at 4K, the eGPU will be much closer. 4. Razer Thunderbolt 3 cable: 2m [RC21-01270101-R3M1] Note: purchased on aftermarket, came in original Razer box. I'm planning on getting a thunderbolt 5 laptop when they come out then continue with the 3080. Posted by u/Snoo-31015 - 3 votes and 8 comments But yeah, don't be surprised if this is the actual performance of your setup, if you're trying to run AAA titles. You really want that Thunderbolt 3/4/5 certification, because USB 4 doesn't have to include PCI tunneling, so the cheaper manufacturers will probably skimp on it. My current laptop is always maxed out with the current As someone who owns the Rog Flow 2022 and the XG Mobile RTX 3080; the XG Mobile is an AMAZING feat of engineering. But the Legion Go had an second USB4 Port which u can use for charging while your ADT Link based EGPU is connected. It has Intel i7-8750H and GTX1070MaxQ with 1x Thunderbolt 3 port. 0x16, so you'll lose about 1/2 the potential bandwidth of the card, because 3. So it looks like your setup is: eGPU -> docking station -> laptop. Thunderbolt 4 specs allows for higher minimum bandwidth - TB3 reaches 16Gb/s whereas TB4 can reach max of 32Gb/s. I have a Aorus GTX1080 Gaming Box connected via thunderbolt 3 to my GS73VR 7RF. So my friend has a pretty crappy laptop and I found one on ebay for $300 AUD which has a competent cpu and thunderbolt 3 usbc port and im thinking about getting an egpu for him. Thanks, cheers the community! Remember: 3060Ti/3070 equate to the 2080/2080 Ti in performance, and the egpu sweetspot was the 2070 last gen Only thing that changed were prices, the cards just moved 2 tiers below, yet guess what, sweetspots for eGPU still managed to rise. 2 slot (provided it is PCIe 4. This should be the perfect laptop for eGPU under 1000€ hopefully(if there is some reason its really bad actually or there is any laptop with similar price thats much better The main difference isn't really in TB3 vs TB4, but in the fact that Ice Lake and Tiger Lake CPUs have an on-die Thunderbolt controller. one problem though, i cant find much help online. TB3 has 24-64% less bandwidth for Host-to-Device when comparing to M. Thunderbolt 3/4 is limited to less than PCI-E 3. The thunderbolt standard helps with compatibility though. Hi, i have just released a video review of the Aoostar AG02, This video is a complete review of this egpu dock with Benchmark and side by side Thunderbolt Vs Oculink game comparison, you will find percentage of performance boost for each tested game at dufferent setting and resolution, i hope you will like my review, thanks you. However, you lack a dedicated internal GPU (or there is a weak one in it). The Thunderbolt 3/4 spec is PCIe 3. M. I want to know if that could lead to differences with real values. If it's an egpu that connects via thunderbolt 3, you'll not notice much performance loss for most LLM (or SD) purposes. bashrc if you use bash. 2 gen 2 for the "dock" portion of the EGPU; with the displays, usb ports, ethernet etc utilizing this connection AND while also developing a proprietary PCI A way to increase TB3 performance is to display on an external monitor plugged to the eGPU itself (especially when having only 2 lanes). 0) actually a better choice bandwidth wise for eGPU than Thunderbolt 3/4 / USB 4. And I also know so will 1070 and 1080. But both m. It would be 20 Gbps otherwise which it is not. It is essentially an RX 580 and a 350W PSU in a pretty enclosure with a Thunderbolt 3 port on the back. Though a superstitious thing for me, I get the same thunderbolt version as my laptop, and that just seems to work more consistently. Quickly. 0 x 4; 15-30% for PCI-E 3. 2 GBps to 3. Alternatively you could try undervolting your processor and iGPU to "unlock" some performance and minimise fan noise. Given the fact that my Laptops Thunderbolt port only provides two PCIe lanes in the first place (thus a speed of 20Gbps), I was wondering if using a longer cable will again divide the available speed in half (to 10Gbps) or will be just fine? I saw someone on egpu. Thunderbolt introduces an overhead because of the protocol latency. Feb 3, 2021 · - Judging from how the eGPU performance offset due to Thunderbolt 3 bandwidth, more powerful GPU means more power unable to utilized by Thunderbolt. You'll probably always have a 5-15% performance loss on an eGPU but also remember using a portable CPU is also going to be a huge factor. Apple is getting better with games outside of steam and thunderbolt 2 is very old. computer recognizes the 1080 as the gpu . Plugable Thunderbolt 3 cable: 80cm [‎TBT3-40G80CM] Note: purchased on Amazon from official Plugable store. If money isn't an issue then might be worth trying it out. sonet box show on thunderbolt as conected but pc cant get anything higer than 60 fps on league of legends on high setings or 20-30 fps on control low settings when i check task manager for usage gpu never passes %50 and cpu is around there as well i cant find out what is wrong . It's important to understand that a Thunderbolt 3/4 eGPU gets about x4 PCIe 3 lanes of bandwidth. USB4 : worse performance (15-60% hit), most of the time plug in and play. Personally, I am impressed the GPD G1 and OneXGPU are so small and have a lot of IO but they are pretty expensive for their GPU performance. Using laptop's moniter will cause higher performance loss due to the fact that eGPU has to send back video data, which make the input to eGPU lower than 4x PCIe speed. They have better performance than thunderbolt in part because thunderbolt controllers have only been integrated into the CPU since Ice-Lake. 0 is determined by chipset. Just ignore anyone who claims GPU X is the most performance you'll get out of it. I belive Egpu has to be the first in a tb daisychain. * Comparing USB 4. If anyone had to chance to try please do tell me if it worked and how it preformed. But yea, egpu and tb3 dock on the same setup is kinda fidly to pull off if you want all features from both. you will get better performance with a gaming laptop i9 13900H with an internal rtx 4070 dgpu than a 4070 egpu with thunderbolt 3 , 4K 120hz will be difficult to reach with a 4070 egpu, Maybe in old and a few not demanding games. then affects tb performance a lot. It does not make sense to pay double to triple the price just to get 10% more fps. does thunderbolt length make a performance difference? I'm going to be using a node or a aorus on a older macbook pro with a apple thunderbolt 1/2 to 3 adaptor and a apple thunderbolt cable should i go with the 0. eGPUs won't make sense for a lot of people, even if Thunderbolt 5 eGPU grants full performance like its desktop counterpart. When 5 comes out its going to be double the amount of information. 2 NVMe and not thunderbolt 3. 2 and Thunderbolt 5 are supposed to give us the best of both worlds, but they are likely releasing next year. If I had to guess, I would assume it supplies at least 60W to the laptop over the TB3 port. 2 on PCIe 4. I’ve heard of people getting it working but it’s going to eat into performance more and potentially bottleneck. I need a setup which is light and portable enough to fit in a travel bag. PCI-E 3. No issues. 0 to 4. Using an egpu already is cutting off 20-30% performance, better to keep that as high as you can after. Resolution of monitor - The reason a higher resolution monitor will eke out more frames from an EGPU than a lower one is simply that a laptop CPU can't keep up with the GPU demand for data at lower eGPU's tend to have less performance loss at higher resolutions because the compute burden gets pushed more heavily to the GPU. 0 speeds when interfacing with a slot/chipset that is only capable of PCI-E 3. I'm planning to buy a mini ITX in a few months, meanwhile I'm playing on my PS5, and sometimes I'm buying one month of GeForce Now. Here are some comparisons I did. Just make sure for the, you don't get a cable that's too long because you won't be running at full bandwidth if you do. although tb3 is capped at 22/gbps, for not having a shared pch with other devices, it will improve the performance for a tb3 egpu. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. I decided to give up the eGPU concept because of the performance vs investment thing. In my experience the performance hit from using an eGPU with its latency and bandwidth problems is severe enough it’s hard to beat a gaming laptop’s internal GPU. io sharing their build using the Razer Core V1 and a P52, so I assume that the Core X would work on my P52s since it is a Thunderbolt 3 connection, and I've seen the 3060 Ti used in the Core X as well, but I am not so sure about other possible compatibility issues. It is slightly more expensive than the R43SG-TB3, but still much cheaper than the prefabricated eGPU enclosures from mainstream manufacturers. Assuming you're using a screen connected to the eGPU, that means there's less information that needs to be sent over the thunderbolt cable since the CPU is mostly waiting on the eGPU to do work (and not the other way The USB 4 standard is a huge mess though. 150fps isn’t that high, especially on a game like CSGO. Thunderbolt 4 standardized the transfer rate. Well I mean that thunderbolt 4 makes improvements in the connection over thunderbolt 3 that make it less finicky and overall better. 1. Dazy chaining docs will sometimes work. I connected it to power, and the TB3 port on my T470 and a number of things happened right away. Bandwidth The optimized setup if using TB3/4 is Laptop to EGPU to external graphics. If the GPU is capable of playing GTA good chance it would still run on a eGPU, keep in mind I don't own a eGPU though it was always something I wanted to invest in for my laptop but it's too pricey. . 2 PCIE 3. Here are a few things that can reduce performance loss: Use an external monitor connected to the eGPU. It’s worth checking egpu. 0x4 pipe. 7% performance increase in Unigine Heaven and 3DMark TimeSpy benchmarks, and peak temperatures after a couple of hours testing were 45C on GPU Core and 55C on GPU hotspot. With m. I have the X390 Yoga and I am also thinking about adding a eGPU aswell. 0 over Thunderbolt 3. Most people buy/use the egpus because they need a laptop more than the stationary performance of a desktop but want some extra graphics power that isn't bounded by the laptop's power system. The current setup is fine on most games but specifically for star Feb 3, 2021 · - Judging from how the eGPU performance offset due to Thunderbolt 3 bandwidth, more powerful GPU means more power unable to utilized by Thunderbolt. prior to 11th gen, tb resides with wifi, hard drive on PCH. The next part is getting a dock to work. I'm planning to add an eGpu to my laptop. We have learned single-Thunderbolt 3 controller enclosures can experience mouse/keyboard lag issues during heavy load. This is because Intel begin to include the TB3 in the processor since Ice Lake gen (Series 10G and above), and this is a important improvement for the performance of the eGPU. My blade was an 8750H but I have tested the same setup with a 1065G7 and 1165G7 now and the 1165 by far had the best performance over thunderbolt. Short answer is no, thunderbolt 3 , in reference to the razer core and like products, function at the same bandwidth. ) USB 4. Yeah, an optimal setup is not pushing data two ways. Thunderbolt 4 is the USB4 spec with a fancy logo and a few requirements like forcing the laptop to charge from it. I have a 3080 in my egpu and thunderbolt 3. It's really inconsistent however. I dont know your use case but for the 3 USB peripherals i have that is enough. 0 cards run at PCI-E 3. 2 PCI-E 3. I will move my mouse and it will freeze then show up where its supposed to be after a second or two. An ADT-Link R43SG 3. It's also worth noting that while gaming is extremely sensitive to the thunderbolt bottleneck, there are also many compute-type applications for eGPUs that are not nearly as sensitive and will performance nearly identically in an eGPU vs a desktop. Thunderbolt 3 and 4 have the same speeds. Despite that fact that it is the mobile variant of the RTX 3080; Asus developed a proprietary connector that combines USB 3. 50cm the available theoretical bandwidth will divide in half from 40Gbps to 20Gbps. Right now, it seems that usb4 and tb4 support the same for egpu, and there is no noticeable difference in performance. The only thing you need to be aware of is that the AMD version of the framework only supports full speed usb4 on one port per side, so you need to connect the egpu to the port that is close to the rear side of the laptop. Can I use RTX3080 as an eGPU for my laptop? I'm thinking to connect the eGPU to the port then my external monitor to the eGPU. The results of the tests typically compare the score results to calculate the performance drop hence why we always say "TB3 eGPUs limit performance by 10 You won't experience better performance with an eGPU. If you are using a high-end GPU (let say a 3080), you may experience a huge performance loss due to that. If you use say a 3060Ti in the eGPU, performance loss can be 10% or less, while still giving you very solid 1080p and 1440p performance. I wanted to know I would be able to connect a egpu to it and if so which one and with what graphics card, I don't want to do anything insane, just play some witcher 3 and total war at a decent fps and settings if possible - Meaning Thunderbolt 4 docks when attached to USB4 get USB3 from host, otherwise they have to spawn a virtual PCIe USB3 controller endpoint inside the unit when used with Thunderbolt 3 hosts - Thunderbolt 3 runs at 40Gb/s after encoding loss, USB4 runs at 40Gb/s before encoding losses (slightly different clock rate) - USB4 on a host has PCI-E 3. Here is a source quote "OCulink offers up to 16 GB/s bandwidth, which is the same as that of PCIe Gen 3 x16 one-way. General concensus seems to be you will get 20-30% less performance than what the GPU would output being directly connected to a motherboard. The only way USB 4. The more FPS, the more info that has to be sent out by the CPU to the eGPU for processing via the Thunderbolt 3 connection. Right now around cristmas sales would be a good time to get a newish mac like a m1. 2 eGPU pros over TB3: 40 Gbps means it is operating at the higher bandwidth of the USB 4. 2 to pcie x16 or oculink. For example a full size 3070 in a desktop will outperform a laptop’s mobile grade 3070 due to higher power limits etc, but a full size 3070 connected as an eGPU will not beat a Hi, i have just released a video review of the Aoostar AG02, This video is a complete review of this egpu dock with Benchmark and side by side Thunderbolt Vs Oculink game comparison, you will find percentage of performance boost for each tested game at dufferent setting and resolution, i hope you will like my review, thanks you. 0. 0 in this confirmation can operate at a quoted 40 Gbps is using PCIe tunneling which is the same way as saying it can operate as a Thunderbolt port, and therefore is Thunderbolt 3/4 compatible. This is not an acceptable workaround because the already-limited bandwidth (22Gbps) of the Thunderbolt 3 connection is reduced further. To that the high end 3 were which is around 40gbs. Better performance (5-8% hit for PCI-E 4. TB3 Vs TB4 is not 16 Vs 32GBps, they are the same speed, just that TB4 has stricter standards Your OneXGPU doing better is most likely to do with the quality and capability of the controller in either of these devices, the OneXGPU has USB4 support, which likely means it's using a newer controller which affords more bandwidth, as opposed to the older TB3 ones The usb 4 port dual functions thunderbolt 3 and as a usb c pd power in port. This might account for the performance difference as TB3 egpu performance penalty is significantly contributed by the limited bandwidth. 2 slot, also a direct PCIe eGPU interface, like shown in this build Obtain a TB3 eGPU now knowing its performance limitations on bandwidth-bound games/apps What are the pros and cons of a M. Yea he's just talking about a Thunderbolt 3 dock. 0 x8. 0x4, so you'll lose about 3/4 of the original 1/2. If you need to display on your own screen then performance drops again some more. On my other USB4 port I need to connect a bunch of 10Gbps USB 3 devices Nah, pricing has improved recently with Mac users and stealth miners offloading their TB3 enclosures starting at ~$150 a pop- not really that cost prohibitive compared to the sticker shock of the original $500 Razer Core with ports that didn't work because the single Thunderbolt 3 controller was overloaded. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. 3. I know 1060 gives good performance on the eGPU. BLUF: Thunderbolt throughput is NOT the bottleneck for eGPUs. Would there be any difference if your setup was docking station -> eGPU -> laptop? I ask because I also have 2 monitors that I want to plug into either the eGPU OR the docking station, and I'm wondering what the best setup would be for optimal performance. 0 x 4 vs. AMD doesn’t have good chipsets that are thunderbolt 3 or 4 compatible. - I agree with this statement. I have seen TB3/4 connections given out on a Dell Precision WS due to wear and tear from unplugging. Oculink: Not plug in and play. Man's is just using this so they can connect one cable to their thunderbolt 3 port on their laptop, and any peripherals, storage, ethernet, and of course the eGPU itself, via the dock. 0 vs. I managed to get +196Mhz on the Core and +503Mhz on Memory. PCI-E 4. 0 x 4, 4. Just the eGPU. My host device is a Lenovo legion go with 2 USB4 ports, each support eGPUs over thunderbolt 3/4. But do you need the dock for something special? Some egpu enclosures have USB and ethernet built in. Using the laptop internal screen reduces the available bandwidth for the GPU to compute with because the rendered image has to go back to the laptop internal GPU to display. Can detach the oculink cable from the host system in 3 seconds and snap a cover on it. u/Splitframe actually discovered this two PCIe lane over Thunderbolt 3 issue and Dell eventually put that support article up. 0m one? will the longer length a performance difference? Performance loss when using oculink or NVME M2 or similar eGPU ports? Thunderbolt eGPUs have a significant performance loss. 2 but not through the thunderbolt 3 port yet, and the few posts I've seen discussing it are sceptical. The remedy is to limit device-to-host bandwidth through Thunderbolt 3 enclosure firmware. We are not talking just bandwidth but also latency. Comparing an egpu to desktop performance (ie, buying a desktop) makes no sense. 0 x 4. Razer Thunderbolt 3 cable: 50cm [Core X Chroma stock cable] 3. Thunderbolt 3 Titan Ridge vs. 0 x 4 you can achieve a 60fps cap in most games, with a few drops under from time to time. I've looked at the ADT Link dock but it is PCIe to M. A factory made eGPU will present all four together in a convenient box, perhaps with an external brick. Will the Thunderbolt 3 eGPU be compatible or optimized with this? Yes. That means performance actually improved enough to use something better. This resulted in ~9. With thunderbolt 45-60 FPS variable is a decent target. So basically your mini PC is trying to negotiate power from your eGPU when it shouldn't, and it is failing or it is running into thunderbolt 3 driver issues. Cause it supports PD Charging over the Cable while the ADT Link UT3G Adapter not supported PD Charging at all. Oculink cures all of these problems. In fact at one point I had two eGPUs, both 3090's, hanging off a couple of thunderbolt 3 ports on an Intel NuCs giving me 48gb of VRAM and very fast inference. Conversely, using a PCI 4 GPU in a PCI 4 enclosure with Thunderbolt 3 or 4 interface will still impact performance. I have an i7 11th gen with a rtx 4080 in a Razer Core X Chroma, at 1440p only a few games run at 120 fps or above. A DIY solution might involve electronics which implement 1+2 (ADT R43SG-TB3) and then you add 3 and 4 yourself. intel thunderbolt 3 eGPU demo starring AMD card. I would say you will have 25% or more performance loss. Now, the performance of the TB 3 eGPUs is heavily depending on the bandwidth of the TB connection, which is limited to 40Gb/s max. Add a $50-$100 USD PSU and you're In comparison, the single-thread performance is now as good as a Ryzen 7 3800x or Intel Core i7-8700K, while the multi-thread performance is comparable to a Ryzen 5 4600U or Intel Core i7-10850H. 2 and Thunderbolt 3 seem to have lots of pros and cons in my case so IDK what to do. Secondly, are you using the cable that came with the egpu? Some cables are rated for thunderbolt 3/4 but for some reason won’t work (like the mono price 2m active) I was about to buy the Razer Core X, but then realized that its actually pretty old and uses thunderbolt 3, not 4. It’s a pcie 3. It's only something that came to me recently, but isn't the M. 2 to x16 riser is fragile, requires setup and disassembly time, and is generally not portable. I see they have a egpu at microcenter "PowerColor Gaming Station Thunderbolt 3 eGFX Enclosure" for $150, but it doesnt get great reviews . it would make sense now with thunderbolt 3 since it can output upto 100watts(PCIE is 75watts i believe), so the tb3port alone can power a low power video card without additional power supply. did hours of google Your assessment is right on. 0 specification. Furthermore, if you use the radv drivers instead of amdvlk, the thunderbolt performance improves a significant bit with RADV_PERFTEST=nosam, like RADV_PERFTEST=nosam %command% on steam, or set this globally on your . Eventually I'll be getting an eGPU for one port, to reduce performance losses for the GPU I don't plan to buy have any other devices connected through this port. You can hook up a SHIT TTOONNN of things to a thunderbolt 3 port. Also what are your thoughts on the eGPUs like the AMD RX 7600M XT ONEXGPU, BoostR, GPD G1, AG01 and such. The Dell Thunderbolt 3 overview article contains inaccurate information as well. Hey guys, I own a dell xps 13, 11th gen i5, the standard new integrated graphics it has, 512gb ssd and 8gb ram. if i figure this out this would mean a great deal to him and im not too smart on external graphics since i found out When you put that into a egpu, most egpu enclosures support only 3. They're severely bandwidth limited on thunderbolt 3. 0 can be found for $45 USD for the third gen version and $60-$70 USD for the 4th gen version. Now the dock that just adds ports won't add any performance, to add gpu performance you would need to add a thunderbolt eGPU enclosure. IMO this scenario is is a much better place. Oculink or NVME M2 and other solutions are much faster than Thunderbolt. I've have seen posts of eGPU performance through m. It has i7 13650hx as cpu and rtx 4060. If your work is bandwidth limited, then you'll see huge differences in performance. Stick with higher midclass. The morefine M600 6900HX has one USB4 port which should work with thunderbolt 3 eGPU or the m. My laptop began charging. The Thunderbolt 3 Connection however had the better “Plug and Play” Feeling. It does this consistently and is unusable in this state. Yet the architecture of 11th Gen Intel proc that integrate the thunderbolt 4 controller is different. They're taking one data point (Thunderbolt has reduced performance over a direct connection) and extrapolating it beyond reality to look smart—and ironically revealing their own misunderstanding instead. I've got a laptop with thunderbolt 3 support (thinkpad t480s) and would like to use an external graphics card with it. But which graphics card maxes out the performance after which there is a diminishing return (Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns in Economics). It can be fustrating to troubleshoot if its a problem with the USB-C Connection, the EGPU box or the laptop interface with Thunderbolt 3/4. The AW 13 R2 has both the DMI low-power OPI GT2 mode and x2 PCIe 3. 0 x4 is the equivalent of PCIe 3. dolvbs drvgaq fnqk gjauj iqeuh gbsf ovtp uwfqe ifcva len