Gitlab ssrf. Chat's Twilio webhook endpoint before version 6.

Gitlab ssrf. This option is really valuable with contractors and for open source projects where collaborators can use any email address to sign-up but usually manual account reviews, group/project assignments are done by maintainers. So the grafana instance that is accessible via /-/grafana/is vulnerable to the SSRF outlined below. Programming code-share platform GitLab has fixed a server-side request forgery (SSRF) issue in a software library after the problem was flagged by a security researcher. Description The version of GitLab installed on the remote host is affected by a vulnerability, as follows: - When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from The remote GitLab install contains a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability as a result of the internal network for webhooks being enabled. gitlab. Why GitLab Pricing Contact Sales Explore; Sign in; Get free trial tryhackme SSRF; README. As some users will recall, an SSRF attack occurs when a threat actor forces a vulnerable server to connect to internal services within the infrastructure of the maliciously targeted organization. GitLab. 5. It turns out to be a quite widely enabled option though, as internal requests are useful for webhooks, CI operations. Find and fix vulnerabilities Actions. This contradiction leads to disabling DNS rebinding attack protection, thus SSRF in Hipchat integration. Navigation Menu Toggle navigation. Menu Brandon Bodnar / sample-node-ssrf-false-positives - GitLab GitLab. Story Behind Sweet SSRF. C#. Impact here is likely limited since it's GitLab. 1 has an SSRF Incorrect Access Control issue. 7, 17. An attacker may be able to leverage this to make arbitrary POST requests in a GitLab instance's internal network. It can also be used to connect to cloud provider's instance metadata API, which may result in the ability to execute commands on the Here is how to run the GitLab SSRF (CVE-2021-22214) as a standalone plugin via the Nessus web user interface (https://localhost:8834/):. Prometheus integration in Gitlab may lead to SSRF. yml is essential part of the paylaod becauyse API expects . 2 allows SSRF via the option for setting a proxy host. CVE-2024-39713 Rocket. root@gitlab:~ nc -lvp 1234 Here, -l is to tell netcat that we have to "listen". Basically, an SSRF or Server Side Request Forgery is used to target the local internal Redis database, which is used extensively for different types of workers. 2. A SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in versions of Apache CXF before 4. This can be used to gain information about the network that Grafana is running on. -v is for verbose output. $10000 Facebook SSRF (Bug Bounty) 31k$ SSRF in Google Cloud Monitoring led to metadata exposure SSRF to internal resources is possible What is the expected correct behavior? Workhorse should not follow redirects to internal resources when downloading dependencies on behalf of the dependency proxy. apache. Hello everyone! I hope all is going smoothly for CVE-2024-39713 Rocket. 1 for Node. 5, 13. 15. Report | Attachments | How To Reproduce. 3d755339 Loading SSRF via repository mirror URL -- 302 Redirect Opening a new issue here as suggested by #215879 (comment 381058501) , the fix for #215879 (closed) would not address the 302 redirect bypass in this case. This issue is now mitigated in the latest release and is assigned CVE-2021-22178. ; Navigate to the Plugins tab. Proceed with caution. 8 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any HackerOne report #1055816 by yvvdwf on 2020-12-10, assigned to @rchan-gitlab:. Contribute to Vulnmachines/gitlab-cve-2021-22214 development by creating an account on GitHub. 2 or later. GitLab存在前台未授权SSRF漏洞，未授权的攻击者也可以利用该漏洞执行SSRF攻击（CVE-2021-22214 maven › org. com make a request to GCP endpoints and make it resolve to 169. 4, 8. org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2696/diffs#note_142737 https://gitlab. This vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user/client to make Grafana send HTTP requests to any URL and return its result to the user/client. Summary SSRF protection can be bypassed by using malformed git repository URL. When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions GitLab’s security teams announced the fix of a server-side request forgery flaw recently reported by an independent researcher. Issue: So the problem here is it blocks localhost url input, but providing external links and if it redirects, the gitlab doesn't make any check after GitLab’s security teams announced the fix of a server-side request forgery flaw recently reported by an independent researcher. Finish editing this message first! Save comment Cancel Please CVE-2021-40822 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): GeoServer through 2. 2, 13. You can clean the cache by running gitlab-rake cache:clear. x through 2. An exhaustive list of all the possible ways you can chain your Blind SSRF vulnerability - assetnote/blind-ssrf-chains. Plan and track work Code Skip to content. I found a blind SSRF vulnerability on the external authorization server configuration. GitLab Community Edition GitLab. SSRF to internal resources is possible What is the expected correct behavior? Workhorse should not follow redirects to internal resources when downloading dependencies on behalf of the dependency proxy. March 15, 2024. 18. Blind SSRF Chains. md 文件中提到对测试 yml文件是否有效。 该漏洞源于对用户提供数据的验证不足，远程攻击者可通过发送特殊构造的 HTTP 请求，欺骗应用程序向任意系统发起请求。攻击者成功利用该漏洞可获得敏感数据的访问权限或向其他服务器发送恶意请求 Tutorial: Configure GitLab Runner to use the Google Kubernetes Engine Troubleshooting Administer Getting started All feature flags Enable features behind feature flags Authentication and authorization ClickHouse LDAP LDAP synchronization LDAP (Google Secure) Rake tasks Troubleshooting OAuth service provider OmniAuth AliCloud Atlassian Atlassian Crowd Why GitLab Pricing Contact Sales Explore; Why GitLab Pricing Contact Sales Explore; Sign in; Get free trial security_whitepapers Orange_Tsai-A-New-Era-Of-SSRF-Exploit Find file History Permalink Orange Tsai speak from BH · c9ea3ac2 Rafal Janicki authored Jul HackerOne report #1055816 by yvvdwf on 2020-12-10, assigned to @rchan-gitlab:. GitLab on Thursday announced a fresh round of critical security updates that address eight vulnerabilities across Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) Unauthenticated CI lint API may lead to information disclosure and SSRF. GitLab是美国GitLab公司的一款使用Ruby on The GitHub service is vulnerable to a SSRF vulnerability. If the redis server is configured to listen on TCP This page contains detailed information about the GitLab SSRF (CVE-2021-22214) Nessus plugin including available exploits and PoCs found on GitHub, in Metasploit or Exploit-DB for verifying Projects with this topic. Hi GitLab Security Team, Summary I found a blind SSRF vulnerability on the external authorization server configuration. Report Hi, While examining validate! function, I found that this implementation contradicts the specification of Ountbound Requests in administrator setting area. ssrf automation information Gitlab SSRF. Updated date. 254. Chat's Twilio webhook endpoint before version 6. Now that we have the shell, we can install netcat so that we can set up a simple server to listen for incoming SSRF requests. Summary By chaining together some redirects and a URL decoding bug, it is possible to achieve a full-read, unauthenticated, SSRF from your Grafana SSRF via repository mirror URL -- 302 Redirect Opening a new issue here as suggested by #215879 (comment 381058501) , the fix for #215879 (closed) would not address the 302 redirect bypass in this case. Unauthenticated CI lint API may lead to information disclosure and SSRF. 8 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE). Skip to content. This vulnerability allows attackers to make unauthorized requests to internal resources. Thanks to @bull for responsibly reporting this vulnerability to us. Cancel You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Problem and impact Assuming a malicious runner specifies an internal host for it's [session_server], GitLab will attempt to connect/make outbound request to internal address space if specified in advertise_address. 7 SSRF配合redis远程执行代码. GITLAB — Just another SSRF issue. Menu Why GitLab Pricing Contact Sales Explore; Why GitLab Pricing Contact Sales Explore; Sign in; Get free trial 👍 0 👎 0 Preview 0% Loading Try again or attach a new file . URL format: HackerOne report #446593 by jobert on 2018-11-18:. md; Find file Blame History Permalink Update Zip · 3d755339 John Ollhorn authored Mar 08, 2021. Note: test. 4. Summary. e 127. 5 and 2. com Possible fixes The typical SSRF checks should be implemented here and for our Go code in general, just like in our A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions before 13. Gitlab was vulnerable to server-side request forgery vulnerability attack due when Prometheus was used. Synopsis The version of GitLab installed on the remote host is affected by a vulnerability. Learn how CVE官方给出的描述是 gitlab ssrf 未授权漏洞。 doc/api/lint. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit a registration-limited GitLab SSRF via Dependency Proxy. The SSRF fix seems didn't apply here, I confirm I can make gitlab. 1, 01200034567, 012. So no SSRF should be possible, but by abusing the CI Lint API, in such a case any unauthenticated user can still abuse CI Lint API for SSRF. -p is to specift the port An unknown Linux secret that turned SSRF to OS Command injection. 6. Instant dev environments Summary Follow-up to https://dev. To fix this issue, upgrading to GitLab version We're exploiting two vulnerabilities for this attack. com. Sign in Product GitHub Copilot. Contribute to jas502n/gitlab-SSRF-redis-RCE development by creating an account on GitHub. 8 and 13. This vulnerability could allow attackers to exploit the Product Analytics Dashboard, leading to Server-Side Request Forgery attacks. GitLab 中存在一个信息泄露漏洞，不当的访问控制使降级的项目成员可以访问创作者的合并请求的详细信息。 Today we are releasing versions 8. 1. 3 and 3. An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 13. Chat Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability: A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) affects Rocket. The first vulnerability is SSRF, where internal services can be reached via IPv6. The GitLab Hipchat integration was vulnerable to a SSRF issue which allowed an attacker to make requests to any local network resource accessible from the GitLab server. Contribute to aaminin/CVE-2021-22214 development by creating an account on GitHub. These versions contain several security fixes, including an important security fix for a critical information disclosure vulnerability, protection against Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks, a fix for some links vulnerable to tabnabbing, a HackerOne report #692159 by xanbanx on 2019-09-11, assigned to hackerjuan:. Describe the bug. Open Osb0rn3 opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 3 comments Open SSRF Vulnerability Arising from Axios URL Parsing #6295. When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions Details: Hi Gitlab Security, I notice the mirroring repositories function allow user to specify ssh, http, https, git scheme to fetch repo. . These Solution. Apparently, Grafana is bundled with Gitlab by default. 0. GitLab Next . Therefore, I think this endpoint should not be public by NOTE: please, note since Rails caches the scanned keys, if you attempt to reproduce this more than once you'll need to first clean rails cache or use a different domain name. Click to start a New Scan. Impact Blind SSRF leading to attacker being able to force GitLab to send TCP packets to forbidden networks. It can Summary: The implementation of git:// protocal in GitLab is vulnerable to CRLF injection and Server-Side Request Forgery. ในบางครั้ง เป็นไปได้ที่จะหลีกเลี่ยงการป้องกันตาม filter ต่างๆ โดยการใช้ประโยชน์จากช่องโหว่ในopen redirection . Upgrade to GitLab version 13. As some users will recall, an SSRF attack occurs when a threat actor forces a vulnerable server The remote GitLab install contains a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability as a result of the internal network for webhooks being enabled. Learn more about GitLab Security Release: 13. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit a registration-limited GitLab instance causing it to make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker's choosing. See Also. Therefore, I think this endpoint should not be public by HackerOne report #878779 by rhynorater on 2020-05-20:. 19. yml extension for validation of remote YAML file This is only exploitable if internal network requests are enabled in Gitlab (they are disabled by default). nessus. ; Select Advanced Scan. The issue is now mitigated in the latest release and is assigned CVE-2018-18646. ; On the top right corner click to Disable All plugins. So if you can push a malicious This vulnerability affects Gitlab instances before version 13. Furthermore, passing SSRF in Prometheus integration. js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 127. 16. 17. Menu Why GitLab Pricing Contact Sales Explore; Why GitLab Pricing Contact Sales Explore; Sign in; Get free trial Explore; Topics; ssrf; S ssrf Projects with this topic. 3. com/bugs?report_id=301924&subject=gitlab wuqidashi (https://hackerone. Summary By chaining together some redirects and a URL decoding bug, it is possible to achieve a full-read, unauthenticated, SSRF from your Grafana GitLab 11. cxf/cxf-core › CVE-2024-28752; CVE-2024-28752: SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in Apache CXF. But, the issue with a SSRF bug is that we can -in this scenario- force a machine (your server) to issue requests to it's own internal ports, so for example if port 888 is not an internet facing port and is not accessible, unlike the 3 Abuse of the Gitlab instance as a proxy to port scan remote targets (I know there are a lot of such proxies out there, but still there should at least be an option to disallow this) Disclosure of origin IP address + User agent of Gitlab instance when its running behind a load balancer or services like Cloudflare for DDoS protection. 10, 13. Any; Batchfile Blade C C# C++ CMake CSS Dockerfile Go HCL HTML Java JavaScript Jupyter Notebook Kotlin Makefile Objective-C PHP Python Ruby SCSS Shell Swift TypeScript Vue (Note: The report is private and inaccessible, but its export is public and accessible on Gitlab Issues: #346187 (closed)) The mentioned bug was fixed by blocking external users from accessing the CI Lint API, but I have figured out that external users still can use the CI Lint feature through GraphQL Steps to reproduce As the Gitlab admin, enable sign ups and enable 3. com Possible fixes The typical SSRF checks should be implemented here and for our Go code in general, just like in our Gitlab CI Lint API未授权 SSRF漏洞 (CVE-2021-22214). TechnoWolf FOSS / rffuzzer. org/u?5a77584e. GitLab was vulnerable to a blind SSRF attack through the repository mirroring feature. 8, and 8. com (Note: The report is private and inaccessible, but its export is public and accessible on Gitlab Issues: #346187 (closed)) The mentioned bug was fixed by blocking external users from accessing the CI Lint API, but I have figured out that external users still can use the CI Lint feature through GraphQL Steps to reproduce As the Gitlab admin, enable sign ups and enable 2016-05-04 07:48 (-0400): @strukt (comment) Hello, Your argument is kinda true in the sense that we already know that ports 22, 80, and 443 are open. A New Era of SSRF Trending Programming Languages! - BlackHat 2017. 5, and 17. com/wuqidashi) reported SSRF vulnerability HackerOne report #860196 by sky003 on 2020-04-27, assigned to @jeremymatos:. An attacker can thereby make POST requests to the local network or to any other one on behalf of the GitLab 是一个用于仓库管理系统的开源项目，使用 Git 作为 代码管理工具，并在此基础上搭建起来的Web服务。 一、漏洞描述. Output of checks This bug happens on GitLab. 5, and 13. The avatar feature in Grafana 3. 12. Bypassing SSRF ผ่านการ filters โดย open redirection. 169. This contradiction leads to disabling DNS rebinding attack protection, thus GitLab存在前台未授权SSRF漏洞，未授权的攻击者也可以利用该漏洞执行SSRF攻击（CVE-2021-22214 Summary https://hackerone. Osb0rn3 opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 3 comments Comments. 1 through 7. https://gitlab. Automate any workflow Codespaces. Using a custom Maven URL for the Dependency Proxy it is possible to achieve full-read GET based Same Site Request Forgery by HTTP redirects. Instant dev environments Issues. Copy link Osb0rn3 commented Mar 14, 2024. com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/55200 and https Meet Gitlab CI Lint API. The GitHub service is vulnerable to a SSRF vulnerability. ; On the right side table select GitLab SSRF (CVE-2021-22214) SSRF Vulnerability Arising from Axios URL Parsing #6295. Language. The application is susceptible to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), a high-risk vulnerability that allows attackers to make unauthorized requests to internal and external resources. com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/322926. http://www. HackerOne report #427364 by bull on 2018-10-23: Hi, I have found an issue which can be used by an attacker to make internal request to localhost i. 11. 152 CVE-2021-22176. 10. Simple SSRF Fuzzer to detect SSRF Injection via HTTP Headers. ในตัวอย่าง SSRF CVE-2024-29415 ip SSRF improper categorization in isPublic: The ip package through 2. 3, Abuse of the Gitlab instance as a proxy to port scan remote targets (I know there are a lot of such proxies out there, but still there should at least be an option to disallow this) Disclosure of origin IP address + User agent of Gitlab instance when its running behind a load balancer or services like Cloudflare for DDoS protection. HackerOne report #878779 by rhynorater on 2020-05-20:. root@gitlab:~ apt update && apt install -y netcat Setting up a raw TCP server is simple as the following command. plugin family. According to the Gitlab documentation Prometheus and its exporters are on by default, starting with GitLab 9. 5 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE). CVE-2024-8635: A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been discovered in GitLab EE versions prior to 17. Write better code with AI Security. 4, 3. 1 and all local ip range. You can see more information at the GitLab issue here: It's actually a typical security issue. ; On the left side table select Misc. Contribute to HieuGITLAB/ptit-ssrf-de development by creating an account on GitHub.