Awaiting reviewer selection how long. Skip to main content.
Awaiting reviewer selection how long 12, awaiting reviewer selection. " Has anyone encountered this situation before? I have sent an email through the system but have not received any response. The journal is based in Europe. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side for now. Share. 6. I have submitted my manuscript to a journal of repute. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Now, an editorial management has to somehow summarise that you are waiting for this step. It's been over two months, and the manuscript's status is 'awaiting main processing. Of course, occasionally we have problems, either because for some reason (work, holidays, personal) no one wishes to review the article or, and this is most frustrating to the staff, reviewers agree to review but then fail to deliver, resulting in an unnecessary delay. And should we be writing to The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; Share. How long should I wait? Should I be more I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. As the Editor has not responded to an email, I would contact the Editorial Office (or journal Admin assistant) to follow up on the matter. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. On the I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. The status ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ means that, based on the peer reviewer (or technical editor review, in this Hello! I have submitted my paper to a journal and it has been 1. Role of the journal editor. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. I have previously published in the same journal I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. However, we can Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give their decision against it. One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers At times there is a long queue or these people are busy. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Check the journal website to see if it provides any information on typical review times. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. After all, all this work is mostly voluntary. Even otherwise, it may be a good Editor here. How long should I wait, and what can be done next? View. I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and investigators, that the EIC decision should not be taking so long. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). If the I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. You may learn more through this similar related query: What does the journal status "Awaiting reviewer reply" mean? When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Improve this answer. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Forms Tracking. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Not sure if the It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. Do not email to ask about Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). I want to know how long will this status last. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Click on “Take Action. Under review: The paper is now under review. You should strive to make an editorial decision within five business days of receiving the last review. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Review and selection of manuscripts. SETTING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED REVIEWS Common reasons to change the number: •More than two of the invited Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. This decision may normally take up to 2 weeks. Hot Network Questions Are plastic stems on TPU tubes supposed to be reliable 80-90s sci-fi movie in which scientists did something to make the world pitch-black because the ozone layer had depleted How to check (mathematically explain) mean and variance for simulated INID (independent but not On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. How to handle situation in which the article has What does awaiting reviewers reply mean? And how long does it take. What the best The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections: Review Settings . Follow answered Apr 19 I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to How long will peer review take? This can vary dramatically, from several days to several months, for different research areas and depending on the responsiveness of referees. To help me (and, by extension, other associate editors) think of the process more clearly, and optimize our role within it. During reject and resubmit, I got I submitted my paper in January. The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment indicates that the journal is using it as a substitute for "Editor Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Can you please guide So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer If reviewers from the previous round are not available (no response or decline to re-review), then it is the task of the editor to evaluate if the comments have been addressed satisfactorily. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. However, I definitely remember the last two: You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. The contributor form will be visible. What does it mean if the status date changes while the status remains with editor? Question. If that is indeed the case and the journal policy allows, you may suggest some peer reviewers (if you know any). None of them has agreed to take on the assignment yet. Does this indicate rejection? I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Visit Stack Exchange. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, Thank you for your question. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". be patient for a little while more. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. How long have you been You have three queries. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the . If the previous editorial decision was B (minor How long does the status of "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" for your paper last? I have also submitted mine for half a month now. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching This could be because potential peer reviewers either are busy or have a conflict of interest with your paper. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. Last month, I sent an e-mail to the administrator, and I received response which said "Senior editor will respond to your query". If you don’t see any change in the status for a few weeks, you could write to the journal, requesting for an Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. What does it imply if a paper directly moves from "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" but not "Under Review I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the editor is in the process Awaiting Editor Selection: The Sage Path Office is ready to send the paper to Editors of potential receiving journals. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. In the latter situation, the final decision may lie with the Editor-in-Chief (EIC). there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. If the paper seems suitable for the journal, the Reviewer invited: Reviewers (commonly ≥ 3) have been invited to review your paper. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. To help journal reviewers understand their role in the process, and how they can be most effective in helping to determine the right outcome for a submission. When I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. 1k بطوریکه ابتدا awaiting reviewer selection و بعد awaiting reviewer agreement و بعد به awaiting reviewer Invitation تغییر کرده و تا بحال حداقل سه بار هر کدام از این جملات در طول مدت یک ماه تکرار شده و الان مجددا برای بار چهارم در حالت awaiting reviewer agreement هست. Reply reply Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. If this Regularly select reviewers from outside of Sage Track and add them to the database. AWAITING REVIEWS. •Clicking on a reviewer’s name will open a new email to that reviewer. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. Wait! It is not late yet. But I have not gotten any response from the senior editor. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. However, as you What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? The status changed to admin check to under review after one week. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! If To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by-point review. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors. Does it mean the work will be rejected? Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Decision . Does this mean that the Skip to main content. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. Stack Exchange Network. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. A good compromise between precision and conciseness would arguably awaiting potential reviewer selection or awaiting editorial assessment, but there are also journals who call this just awaiting reviewer selection. NOTE: Before creating a new account for a reviewer, use the reviewer I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. The reviewer has accepted the invitation They select the peer reviewers. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Any insights from anyone with recent experience with the journal? Thanks! Most reviewers are excellent, giving freely of their time, and return excellent reviews within the two week deadline. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Brother, do you remember how much money we will be paid per page if we exceed the number of pages? 12. 5. ’ Does this mean that it has not been sent for review? Thank you. Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. There are three stages: the paper enters the “Awaiting AE Decision” status. Whether a long time at this status hints towards a negative outcome. Publication Success. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review reviewer selection. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. Can I send a email to AE? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. Improve this question. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. ممنون Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. They may have reached out to potential reviewers and may be awaiting a response. If that’s not the case, the journal is The overall timeframe, 2 weeks from submission to decision, is at the long end of what we'd like for a reject without review (we try to turn papers around quickly), but it's not uncommon. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. All submissions will first be subject to an in-house evaluation process with respect to suitability for BLC in terms of quality, content and methodology. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. ’ This must be a journal-specific descriptor for the AE In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. When the system shows the status “Reviewer invited,” it means that invitations have been sent out to reviewers, but they have not yet accepted the invitation. At times, your topic or even your field may be too specialized to easily find a reviewer. 6. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Loading Tour I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded The change back (from ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’) possibly means that not all the scores were in (after initially believed so) or that the AE sent the paper back to one or all reviewer(s) for some clarification. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. " Should I expect a I noticed that the status of my paper changed immediately to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ without being ‘Under Review. The journal says on . ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. But you may never know. t backed up) The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. Stack Exchange Network . The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. They’ve also referred the manuscript to the Managing Editors (ME) and to the What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. They are checking the notes from the Managing Editor’s assessment to determine who to send to. A copy of the reviewer list will be available. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). Mega Nav. OR. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. 2023. If No rush, as long as I am hired. 25 I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. It's a waste of effort to study damage Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. For now, you only need to wait. Awaiting Editor Invitation: The Sage Path Office has selected Editors and will be sending them invitations to consider the manuscript shortly. Can I appeal if my paper is rejected? This depends on the The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. 3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers and guide the paper through several revision stages. Often authors may track the progress of their paper online. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. Follow edited Sep 12, 2022 at 19:10. In After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Not sure if the It has been two months since the submission, and it is still "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. ). " Related reading: Why When the system shows the status “Reviewer invited,” it means that invitations have been sent out to reviewers, but they have not yet accepted the invitation. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Let’s take them one by one. How long should I normally wait for the editor’s response, and when should I send a reminder email? Also, if I send a reminder email, what kind of message is appropriate and would not offend the journal editor? Please give me advice. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. Okay, it has been sent for review again. This stage is used less frequently. , "Awaiting AE decision". Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. I am really AE stands for "Associate Editor. However, on the same day, the My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Having two statuses for a single manuscript is uncommon. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. 15-6. The form can also be rescinded if needed. However, you can continue keeping a look-out for status updates, to see how your manuscript is progressing, and in case you see it for long at a AWAITING REVIEWER RESPONSES •When the manuscript moves to the next task, the tab at the top right will change to correspond with the current queue. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. Not sure if the The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 21, awaiting AE decision. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Buffy. Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. Now, it shows Awaiting Decision. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that I have submitted a perspective article. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. If the paper is to be rejected at this point, a rejection letter is sent out and the file is closed. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. ’ It is a After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. e. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. Is it because of the summer break in Europe? I wonder After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. 2. ' Already written mail to the editorial coordinator? Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. However, we have explained the statuses below: Awaiting Second Opinion: This means that the associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and has made a tentative decision on it. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 I have a paper under review and the status is still "awaiting reviewer selection" for more than one month. The status of the paper changed several times. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. 5 months since then. What does this mean? Meaning of the status when "Awaiting A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. However, the Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. The review is then submitted AE stands for Associate Editor. ' However, I'm 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. Please note that the form must be submitted "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. 努力努力最努力 2022-09-17 Hello, I would like to ask, how long does it take from awaiting decision to the editor giving you feedback? 霍金斯 2022-09-14 I have submitted two articles, and it took two months for both of them to be reviewed. Log In/Register. Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer reviewers. If you can’t be, which is totally understandable, just Reviewer List. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. A sudden The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. However, I just noticed that the status of my I will disagree. Skip to main content. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. Academic Editing Services Editing Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. Skip to main content Ask a Question. ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! It is helpful to also provide suggestions for additional peer reviewers. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Editorial policies or practices: My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. So, why has it returned to I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). If the ‘Reviewer Invited’ status preceded, it means that at least one reviewer has agreed to review the paper. Role of the reviewer . 七十二变 2021-09-24 Major universities still only recognize the basic version, which is just a third-tier. This change has Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. View. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. The AE’s role in the editorial structure 2023. For most manuscripts, in the At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. To do this via the system: Once you have found potential reviewers using the selection tips provided in this document, you will need to verify them Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. It’s quite likely your paper has become stalled in the journal system because of a lack of peer reviewers. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. 401k 88 88 gold badges 1. What does this status mean? Thanks in advance. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Should you give up on waiting for a long-promised review, you may decrease this value, but ideally it should not drop below 2. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Each time I invite new I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Awaiting Editor My paper underwent a revision. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers Hi everyone. Soon after the Associate Right after the submission, the status changed to "Awaiting AE assignment" but it remains for about three months. Therefore, including some peer reviews I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. 2 answers Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Some editorial systems give the I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. binshi juqgo usrmtx uavup nklpdk joim cpfo vmxpud upd gdxrx