1440p tv reddit. Felt like my game was having a seizure or .

1440p tv reddit I might make the final jump to 4k OLED at some point, but compared to what I'd been on, it's incredible so no complaints. Because there's not a whole number scale factor between 1440p and 4K, the images will look slightly more blurry than if you were playing on a native 1440p monitor. The Fire TV Stick only knows 1080p OR 4K but nothing in-between. Please advise me whether there is any point to plugging the PC to the 4K TV, and play in 1440p on it, or should I just stick with PC gaming on my 24" HD monitor. Go back to General Fidelity and change the color space to PC RGB. 4K is a great resolution. Is there a simple way to mirror a 120hz+ 1440p monitor to a 1080p TV? My wife would like to watch me play games, and ever since I purchased a 1440p monitor, I am having a hell of a time trying to get Diablo 3 to run. ) Most games have some sort of resolution scaling in the settings nowadays, and it will look much better than just running 1440p on a 4k screen. 1440p is still a great resolution. 3840x2160@60hz 4:2:2 supports the widest range of refresh rates, can swap color spaces Excuse me if I'm miss-wording this, but I have a 4k 6-series TCL 55" TV. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or for mid range - IPS, 165hz, Reddit favorite I’d go for a 1080p monitor. My old main monitor was 1080p 165 hz, and I didn’t know if I wanted 1440p 165hz or 1080p 240hz. Not a lot of games will run at 1440p natively on the series s so they end up looking a bit rough around the edges. Depends on the size of the monitor as well, as 1440p is fine for e. Works beautifully! Go to NVidia display pane, set 1440p and whatever Hz your tv can handle and limit the FPS 2 FPS below that limit if you use G-sync. Imo, get a tv which supports 1440p and 4k, for the games that are tough to run, set windows to 1440p and the tv will upscale it. viewing distance isn't changing, you're I've got similar results on the same settings with similar specs: Overclocked 3900x running at 4. Because youtube compress all files, and their algorythm is not sparing. It's not perfect but it's pretty good. I play everything at 1440 21:9 and just adjust graphics for suitable performance, nothing is played at 1080. 27 inch monitors but a bit low for 32. If it works, congrats, your TV does 1440p You will now notice the screen is way brighter than you had it. Overall though, general picture quality and black levels make a much, much bigger difference when it comes to watching movies IMO. Same reason why there are no 1440p TVs. I've got multiple 1440p 144hz monitors and a 4k OLED TV connected to my 3090. This term is not standardized like some others, hence there is more than one resolution meant with this. 4k looks better of course, but it's not a huge deal for me. I have a 4K Apple TV with 4K HDR set to on on my Samsung Q80R. Often OOS »Samsung Odyssey G5 – Curved and sometimes on a great sale. Any idea on what the issue could be? I have the Apple TV set to 4k along with HDR and match content range set to on. 4% increase in pixel density (92 --> 108 ppi) 24 inch 1080p --> 24 inch (likely actually 23. I have no explanation why this works but it puts your TV back to standard as far as I can tell. Depends. After my old 1080p TV got broken, I bought a discounted 4k TV (Samsung QN90B 50inch) to watch movies and be used 50% of the time as a pc monitor for gaming, web surfing, etc. Even playing at 1440p and having the TV upscale it, when you do eventually get the QD-OLED, you are gonna want something that can do 1440p @120fps at high quality settings, and depending on the games you play, those fps numbers could be really easy to hit at 1440p, or if its a new AAA Game, 120fps @1440p might be out of reach. Monitors are good mostly in showing "native" resolutions. This is what I did and would do depending on my setup, what u/SnooHamsters3520 said, keep the desktop resolution at 4K 120Hz, and set games to 1440p 120hz. Is it worth to buy a 4k monitor for ps5? Now I have a 27" 1440p monitor but I am thinking about changing it to a 4k 27". Feel free to bring up technical issues and other… Some monitors can downsample 4k to 1440p. I currently own a 2013-ish Dell S2340L (23 inches, 1080p, IPS, 60Hz), so I'm looking for a replacement. My problem is that the mCable does not see these TVs as 1440p compatible (my capture card is at least seen by the mCable as 1440p capable). I’ll finish the free trial and cancel, I’m not paying $10 (eventually $20) extra for just 1440p. LG OLEDs don't have native support for 1440p, but they'll still display the image as expected when the resolution is forced by the source. . But I did want to chime in with info you might find helpful about whether or not you could expect to see a difference between 1440p and 4k on a 55" TV at ~7 feet. If No G-sync, then that doesn't matter. Keep in mind this is a 1080p TV, so I set that resolution, and on the top-right the TV shows the 1440p resolution I'm really considering picking up the 32-inch Odyssey G7 as prefer the larger screen for productivity, but I am concerned that the PPI of the monitor would be much lower than my current 27-inch 1440p display. I've had a lot of success doing this with lg oleds. I know people will refute it by saying PPI etc. I've been gaming on a 40" Samsung 1080p TV for the past 2 years and I don't know why I had been gaming on a monitor before haha. I would be putting the TV on my Desk. This means that devices that don't allow you to manually pick their resolution have to choose between 1080p and 4K, since those are the resolutions the TV says it supports through HDMI. However the higher the resolution, the more bandwith is required. So I got an mCable that upscales stuff to 1440p. The thing is I am also a bit of a motion clarity nut. there really is no point in going for 1440p anymore, especially when you think you only get proper lods at 4k They end up looking about the same, with 1440p probably having a slight edge. My experience is 1440p does not look good at all on 4K TVs yet PC games at 1080p also don't look all that hot on a 4k TV. Welcome! For PC's and general gaming, here are the most frequently recommended taken from reddit posts. I can recommend to everyone to buy an OLED TV but don't do same shit like I did and don't pay for features you don't need! So what I learned is that a 4k TV ≠ 4k TV. 5" screen. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I game on my 4k TV and have checked out 1080p and 1440p in PC gaming before at times and it does not look acceptable to me compared to playing at 4k. Then I updated it to tvOS 14. Since my has a higher native resolution, I'd like for the stream to upscale to 4K even though the source is at a lower resolution. I think 1440p at 144-165hz is the sweet spot for visuals and performance. 0, so it is a choice between 4k @ 60hz or 1440p at 120hz is my understanding. 1440p offers a screen resolution of 2560×1440 pixels, while 4K offers a much higher 3840 x 2160. So, should I buy new Blu-rays in 4k or But the PS5 will run the 1440 at 60fps or lower with most games, unless the game specifically says it will support up to 120 fps. I also use a 4k tv in the living room and tbh 4k looks better for ps5. The TV is also 120Hz, so running at 1440 allows me to run most games near 120fps keeping things super-smooth. Your monitor does 1440 and lower, your Fire stick does 4K and lowerit's choosing the highest compatible signal, 1080. This TV also runs at 120Hz for 1440p or 1080p which makes it an enticing trade. Having a native resolution to match the display results in a much cleaner, crisp image which helps alleviates issues like pixel crawling & artifacts. Instead they only seem to make 4K TVs & anything 1440p is designed & marketed as a monitor. Reply reply Rusky82 Hello gamers. The lower resolution usually the better input delay so 1440p is much better for competitive games, 4K looks much nicer so it is better for AAA game especially pve (player vs entity) games as For reference, I am thinking of getting the HP X27qc (curved, 27inch, 1440p, 165Hz). You could run at 4k with dlss quality and it renders the game at 1440p but does the dlss upscaling to 4k. Aug 31, 2018 · Native 4K obviously looks best, but 1440p can look decent in some games. LG OLED C2 , it’s the perfect tv . After doing some reading, I've seen people say 1440p looks good on the CX/C1. I was curious if anyone had any experience with running 1440p @ 120hz on an OLED TV? Thinking about building a gaming PC and pairing it with our 2017 OLED that has HDMI 2. 1440p is similar, but will have slightly higher framerates, which helps with temporal resolution. Running DLSS or FSR in quality mode on a 4k screen upscales the game from 1440p. 1 port and others said only 55" and above can do high refresh rate gaming. This is because 1440p is a niche monitor resolution, not a TV resolution. Decided I'd rather play at 30fps with my single oc'd 1080 than 60 at 1440. Everything is ethernet, and my network speed tests at around 220 mbps. For tv wise it's all hard to tell but you can use best buy to click through options and if they have it in store check it out. 0 should support 1440p 144 Hz so why is my G5 not supporting it through HDMI 2. In my opinion that would probably be better because running natively at 1440p would mean you're making the TV do the upscaling, and I'm like 99% sure that's worse than dlss doing it. I'm looking for a TV to act as my PC monitor. There is no native* 1440p content only 1080 and 2160 (4K). My PC is good enough to run games at 1440p (Ryzen 5 5600x, RTX 3060Ti), so gaming shouldn't really be an issue. VA panel. So I'm asking if the Chromecast will run at native 1440p or not. This will disable RTX HDR though since that doesn’t work with scaling resolutions. Is this card enough for 1440p gaming on high to ultra on most modern games and low medium on competitive games Are normal Blu-rays in a quality, which would be basically indistinguishable at 1440p? Then I could just save the money. Hey r/monitors, . You get exactly double the increase in density compared to going up to a 27" 1440p without taxing your GPU any more. A better move for the gaming experience is from 1440P to 1440P Ultrawide as the extra side spacing helps with game view and element placement. It makes sense as 4K Perf has a 1080p native image while 1440p Quality uses a 960p as a base. But I wouldn’t buy a 4K tv to play at 1440p. I am specifically wondering if the Xbox Series S (which is max 1440p, and can be scaled up to 4k) would look substantially different than the Xbox Series X (Which is max 4K, and can be scaled up to 8k). But if I'm playing eSports titles like rainbow six siege I still perfer my 1080p 240hz monitor. Ended up getting the series X to make the most out of my monitor! Edit - or a decent 60 hz 1080p TV. Still, I’d rather a 4k30 option instead of just limiting it to 1440p. I would still go with the monitor 1440 at 120fps, it will look amazing, and there is a big difference from 60 fps to 120 fps. I have an RTX 3080, but 1440p is stilll the sweet spot for newer AAA titles, especially ones with ray-tracing (I've become a huge fan of RT). 4K is visually stunning and the difference from 1080p to 4K is super noticeable. So, I have a RTX3060 so I run most modern games in 1440p instead of 4k. 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. You can find some 32" 1080p TVs, but even those are few and far between because it's all about price at that size. You'll be fine with a 4k TV. I decided to wait a bit though, until November/December 2022 to upgrade my gaming system and TV. I know hdr works with it. All modern TV's have internal upscaling that is far superior than what monitors use. A 27" at 1440p is ~109ppi. A) 1080P ? B) 1440P upscaled to 4k to fit my 4k tv ? Does a 1440P upscaled to 4k looks better than a native 1440P or worst ? Or let’s say : What makes the better image quality : A XBox Series S plugged into a tv that supports 1440P or A Xbox Series S plugged into a tv that doesn’t support 1440P but supports 4k ? For some reason, with the TV or my Xbox are not able to use HDR (but my PS4 slim can). My options are: Buying an "average" Samsung 55 4k TV . Chances are that yours does not, it's simply something you have to try. I have a small apartment and this is large enough. Steam Hardware Survey says 67% of Steam gamers have 1080p displays, and will probably be 95% when you include non-gamers. They look quite blurry in 1440p but look sharp in 4k. 1440p is just a place where people nowadays can feel safe about their 900 bucks 12 GB GPU purchase. Going from 1080 to 1440 usually costs me about 10-15 frames average. 0 cable at 8 BPC, you can decide between full screen keeping the aspect ratio or nor scaling, I use this also because the horizontal size is too much for desktop usage. The downgrade felt way steeper than the increase I got from switch to the g7 original. After getting my hands on a 3080, I'm considering making the leap from 1440p to 4K. Dec 19, 2024 · Best to use ingame upscaling - (DLSS/FSR/XESS etc. 1080p videos look great on my 1440p monitor, videos are much smoother to scale than real-time rendered video games which is where you usually see problems. So essentially getting a 27" 1440p will provide a less "grainy", thus sharper, image, while a 32" 1440p will have the same "grain" as a 24" 1080p monitor, so only get the 32" if you want the size and not the density. 1080p would be fine since the pixels downscale 4-1 with no overlap color approximation. 4K just looks so much better A 1440p monitor is useful regardless because desktops and video games can make use of any resolution, but a 1440p TV would be mostly useless. However, the quality can vary greatly by game. When I plug the HDMI cable into Samsung G7, I get 1440p 144 Hz but when I plug the same cable into Samsung G5, I'm stuck at 1440p 144 Hz. The closest match where 2k would also be 1440p would be 1920x1440, but that is an outdated 4:3 aspect ratio. Meanwhile, 1440p, especially in computer screens, refers to QHD (2560x1440) or WQHD/UWQHD (3440x1440). The other option is to use 4K and downsample, which will look softened and blurry. But my Apple TV 4k 2022 supports the 2560x1440p resolution, but I have to go into 'other formats' to select 1440p. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now The TV must be able to support 1440p via HDMI 2. Or check it out in the app stores I have a 27in Ultra Gear 1440p monitor and Apple TV 4K 64 gig. I'd like to hear from some of you first-hand on what your impressions were when you made the jump from 1440p to 4K yourself, whether that be with gaming, work, video production, the day-to-day- experience, etc. I feel that at this small size it looks pretty much the same as 4K for gaming, namely that due to everything being smaller it's harder to see all the tiny details so those being lost vs 4K is less of an issue and the performance improvement is significant. 1440p monitors are very expensive right now. Can the TCL C645 43" do high refresh rate gaming? 24 inch 1080p --> 27 inch 1440p is a 17. Always game on the g7 until one day when I was using the g7 for my laptop and decided to game on the g5. I tried a note demanding game, rust, where I get 100-120fps. Although the game runs at 1440p, the PS5 is only able to actually display games at 1080p or 4k. The TV will never know that the game is "1440p" if the game system upscales to 4K, and PlayStation systems don't even support 1440p output, so at no point will the TV catch a whiff of 1440p. Didn’t enable DSR or anything on my PC. E. You have to use one of the supported resolutions (1080p, 1440p), so something like 1800p wouldn't work. 8% increase in pixel density (92 --> 124 ppi). 4k DSR looks pretty nice and depending on the "smoothness" setting, can remove a lot of aliasing (but with some blurring). I barely ever play games on my 1440p screens anymore because things look so much better on the TV. Hell, i even use 1440p as desktop resolution because that way i can have 120Hz (on my TV 4k is limited to 60Hz). Get the Reddit app (movies/tv shows) that use 1440p resolution, it's Kinda wish there was more of a focus on 1440p in the TV market instead of just the monitor market. I'm pretty sure 1440p is the source resolution for the quality profile, and deep learning magic does a better job inventing On a 4k TV, it would internally render at 1440p and upscale to 4k. If it does support 4K input the stick will stream 4K but the monitor will downscale it, the monitor will not upscale your 1080p input, it's just gonna be 1080p which will look worse on Keep your monitor set to 4k and just set it to the resolution you want in game so 1440p, 1836p, ect. It was a temporary solution, the goal for HD was 1080p, but it was difficult and expensive to make during the early days of HD, so as temporary solution, 720p and 1080i were allowed. Luckily it seems that you can work around that by blindly confirming on the 60Hz test screen, which allows it to proceed to the 120Hz test which you'll Some suggested that it can at 1440p with the HDMI 2. So the older apple tv 4k (pre 2021) doesn't seem to support 1440p. Hi there, yeah me too. You're kinda describing exactly what it's supposed to do. as long as you have enough VRAM, 4K dlss/fsr 2/tsr performance will simply look better than native 1440p will ever hope to achieve. I7 5820k stock but I've experimented with OC. 1 and VRR Tbh I can't even tell the difference VRR on or off on traditional FPS competitive multiplayer like Warzone and r6 siege but in single player games like GOW it seems to make a difference and make play smoother so I just leave it on all the time I think you can do 1440p 120fps with BUT the picture of the LG was sooooo much better compared to my cheap Samsung TV. I have a 4k TV and a 1440p IPS monitor. Annoyingly, some of those TVs (including mine) only accept 1440p@120Hz, and don't accept a 1440p/60 signal, and the PS5 tests 1440p/60 before 120, failing entirely if the 60Hz signal fails. HDMI 2. It’s because everyone expects ultra quality at native res, or even a high frame rate on top of that. 1440p has a high enough pixel count that DLSS/FSR Quality is pretty good, and ultra settings almost always just tank FPS for barely any visual difference. In your case as much as I love gaming on a 4k TV, I'd probably just play on your current monitor instead or simply wait for when you do get that 1440p one. 32" is too nig for me. Internet scaling issues become less obvious the higher the source resolution is. With the price of 1440p monitors getting lower and lower, and graphics cards that are able to do 1440p reasonably getting more affordable, its starting to make much more sense. For anyone looking at this in the future, I eventually solved this by running OBS (Open Broadcast Software) and setting the preview to full screen on the TV. And it's great. Is it best just to set the in game resolution to 1440p and then let the TV do the rest of the work? I'm using the LG 27gr95qe monitor ATM which is quite expensive but worth it IMO 1440p, 240hz with HDMI 2. Hello, I have a few ideas and need support. Even when I change the resolution to 1080p, I can only select 60 Hz. But 4K-1440p is not as clean a transition. I use my setup for a bit of everything, but mostly gaming and streaming videos like YouTube, movies and tv shows. TVs standards are 480p\480i (most common pre HD), 720p\720i, 1080p\1080i, and 2160p. Open Nvidia control panel, go to manage 3D settings, and under global setting set max frame rate to 60 and every game will hit that 60fps wall. If you use a 4K OLED TV you could drop your resolution entirely - they already have excellent internal scalers. I'd definitely use dlss before that, even if it meant dlss performance or even ultra performance. So I'm going to be building a pc with a 1440p monitor. The fact is, the higher the resolution, the sharper the image. I am using moonlight on steam link to stream from my PC with a 1440p 120hz monitor to a TV that is 4K and also 120hz. It's the same on my Samsung QN90A. I do not plan to play competitive games, my question is more focused on games like God of war. g. Same reason why there were no 1024x768 4:3 media even though it was the most common resolution of monitors in the early 2000s. Performance varies, widely depends. Most tvs dont support 1440p If you want a 1440p 120 native display then buy one. »Alienware AW2721D – 1440p, 240hz, IPS, G-Sync, Just a beast of a monitor Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. Games can use all sorts of weird resolution, and quite a few modern games use dynamic resolution scaling. TV scales whatever signal you send. The clarity and sharpness that you get in games, especially with objects on the distance that can still look blurry at 1440p, is absolutely worth the upgrade if you care about a great picture. Samsung Odyssey g5 1440p 27" and 1440p g7 27" dual monitor setup here. Found this sub, thought i should post here to get a conclusive answer. 1 or the 2. Always pay attention to refresh rate some will say 120 motion blur or something which means it's really 60hz with an upscale but won't be true 120hz. There are no 1440p movies\shows. 4 HDMI 2. Your TV will be in 640x480. Film/TV will either be 720p, 1080p, or UHD/4k/2560p. 1 ports Supports 4K at 120hz Variable refresh rate VRR Flawless contrast and color accuracy Dolby Vision , Dolby Atmos and HLG support Nvidia gsync support Game optimizer and filmmaker mode. (I checked and 1440p is pretty expensive still so you may just want to go with 1080p or grab 3 23" 1080p for eyefinity. Just built my first PC recently and wondering if anyone has any suggestions for gaming at 1440p on a 4k OLED TV (C2)? It seems like there are multiple ways to go about it and it's a bit overwhelming. Playing witcher 3 right now on a 4K tv and dealing with this. If it does run at 1440p, does it also do HDR? Yeah I've done a lot of reading but I'm getting many conflicting answers. I can definitely tell the difference between 1080 and 1440. pixel density and resolution both determine how good the picture will appear. However, the YouTube TV app is only showing 1440p as the maximum resolution while I am currently watching both the USFL and MCI vs Aston Villa soccer game. I have a 1440p monitor and a 4K TV and have been streaming in 4K just fine. Especially for older games which are 1080p upscaled ones. 1440 to 4K has diminishing return in game image quality and increases cost yet again. I do own 4090 and have both 65” 4K TV and a 34” 1440p UW monitor. I have my PC running through my 4k TV. I also thought I read somewhere that the Apple TV doesn’t support 1440p? Yes it doesn't support 1440p, only 4k, 1080p and some sub 1080p resolutions. I you connect a display that only supporto 1440p and below as an input you will have to use 1080p as maximum resolution. 1440p lets you get monitors bigger then 24' and keep a similar or even higher PPI. 0 port. I could buy 27" 4k but it's more expensive and from what I heard, for 27" 1440p is enough. It felt like a ridiculous downgrade. but the facts are, more pixels equals sharpness. Especially for gaming. For any tv inquiries, gaming or non gaming , LG Oled C2 is the only correct answer. And I am 1 meter away. I had ATV 4k (1st gen), with factory tvOS 14. But none of those are 1440p. Would 1440p upscaled to 4k on this tv look good compared to my current 1440p monitor? I ask because I read so many posts saying 1440p to 4k looks bad and blurry. Felt like my game was having a seizure or I play at all three resolutions 1080p at 240 HZ, 1440p at 165 HZ and 4K at 60 HZ. I bought a 1440p monitor for my series S and the games look crap. Buying RTX 4090+1440p OLED and upgrading with OLED TV when it comes out in the future. I'd also drop some settings down if need be. It does this with only a marginal increase in cost. I ended up spending extra for the omen 27qs, which is 1440p 240hz monitor, I thought the upgrade to 1440p would be minimal, but it is actually game changing. the reason people are switching to 4k resolution is because they're using 27 to 32 inch displays, where pixel density is much greater. Pixel density matters the most, if you're sitting half a meter away from a 27 1440p monitor then you need to sit 0. I am thinking of getting a QN90A to use with my rtx 3070 on my PC. As for vrr, I’m not sure. » Dell S2721DGF - IPS, 1440p, 165hz, Freesync - Higher end but built on a great legacy. Anyway, I found this setting to force an HDMI input instead of auto-detect, and then I went to display resolution and found 1440p unlocked. And to answer your last question from the post, 1440p is not a standard consumer video resolution so you'll find absolutely no content there. Games look exactly how they normally would playing in 1080p on a 4K monitor because they have a similar scale factor. 980ti, 16ram. Moonlight's resolution has only to do with the video capture that you will be streaming, so really even if you set it to stream at 4k, you'll be streaming a 1440p video upscaled to 4k. In I use a LG CX 48" OLED TV as my main monitor. I don´t think the difference is that noticeable when playing on a TV at larger viewing distances when compared to a monitor but I do notice an improved overall sharpness and actually prefer this mode vs 1440p Quality. The pixel density of a 24" 1080p monitor and a 32" 1440p is the same at ~92ppi. Second, you can use the rescaling option in the Game Optimizer menu to reset the resolution of your C2 to 3840x1600. 1440@60 at at least 20mb/s quality (better higher). Found this in another thread: "Settings > Streaming > Advanced > Resolution Limit and set the resolution to match your phone's display (2560x1440) rather than your computer's display (1920x1080). I have to manually adjust the display settings in the desktop to 1440p instead of 4k to make these games full screen with 1440p. The 240hz also feels very smooth. Right now I have a 32 inch IPS gaming monitor 1440p. 2 it worked 1440p in OS perfectly fine (not sure about streaming resolution). Idk, 1500 buys you a 1440p ultra PC build tbf with all the advantages of a PC, I don’t think that console budget gaming warrants an $1500 TV purchase unless the TV is used for high quality movie nights too or whatever. Better to for a native 1440p display or to save up for the 4K 120 display. It is not a real resolution for motion pictures and TV shows. 73K subscribers in the OLED_Gaming community. However in general, games don't upscale so well on monitors compared to TV's . Would love a 45 or 50 inch TV with 1440p to go well with my 4070. And by high refresh rate I mean 120fps. I just want to confirm that 1440p does in fact look good on the display. Difference between 1080 at 10mb/s and 1440 at 10mb/s is like night and day already, and now imagine going higher. Will the gap between future OLEDs and current ones be Yep, it can stream 4k60 from other codecs but the YTTV VP9 must be inefficient and require more processing power. The max it would support was 2048x1152. that's simply not true. Looks weird. Change the resolution to 1440p. If I had a 4k tv, and I connected that monitor to the tv with an hdmi cable, would the scaling make it look very blurry? I've tried playing at 1080p on my 1440p monitor and it looks almost the same as it does on my laptop. I’m upgrading my 3060 ti to a 7800xt NITRO+ And probably getting a 1440p 144hz monitor . However, at the distance I am from the screen (6ish ft) there is no noticeable difference between 1440 and 2160. Or buying an RTX4080+OLED TV and upgrading the graphics card to the 5000 series. You’d have to look up your tv on Rtings and see if it supports a forced 1440p before going that direction. You do the math. 4ghz all core OC, hybrid cooler evga 3080ti with auto OC done by EVGA precision (don't remember the exact number but it's like +110 on the card. 8 meters away from a 50 4K TV to achieve same visual clarity, DSR can help by enhancing the details and anti aliasing in the image its still the same resolution displayed on the monitor but the output is clearer. The pixel size when you get to 4K, is small enough that non native resolutions can still be sharper than the human eye is capable of distinguishing the difference between native and non native resolutions displayed If not, you have to run the Shield at 1440p, but I believe every user should look into the Refresh Rate app to help with judder and the like, so you might be able to just set Gamestream/Moonlight to open in 1440p and leave the default system resolutionat 4k. This allowed full 1440p 144hz G-SYNC on my main display with a full 60hz display on the TV with less than half a second of a delay. If the TV has good 1440 to 4k upscaling, maybe it doesn't matter much. In most games it is hard to get 4K at a high fps. I am going to install a new computer system and I am stuck between 2 options. That out weighs the 4K in my opinion. And DLSS should do an even better job on this. In terms of performance, 1440p offers good clarity and nice detail which is perfect for gamers who want to take their gaming experience up a notch without breaking the bank. The general consensus seems to be that the mClassic does help with scaling to 1440p, removing any bluryness, which is mostly what I'm afraid of with a 32" 1440p monitor, others have said the switch performs fine on a 1440p monitor without any blurry images. I can't go back lol On a 1440 display 1080 won’t be upscale by am even integer like 720, so the result is washed out and “jaggy”. TV's have good upscaling AI tech because most TV shows still aren't HD, so they have to look good upscaled in these massive size displays we have today. I am asking because I want to use 2 1440p with my Macbook Pro (current model) and use the Apple TV as a third wireless monitor, since the Macbook Pro doesn't support triple monitors through one thunderbolt 2 port. If I were you I would get a nice 32" tv to mount on a wall or to the side of your main monitor and then get a nice 27"-30" monitor for your computer. But the resolution increase is a tiny factor in that. All I did was go to the NVIDIA Games app on the shield, scroll all the way down to Settings, select my PC, and under quality change it from Auto to 4K 1440p on my Samsung Q8FN is excellent for gaming, gives the best refresh rates and VRR. There is nothing wrong with 1440p, but I would place the jump from 1440p to 4k as more visually significant and noticeable than the jump from 1080p to 1440p. 0? I don't have enough slots on my GPU to use another DP. After some research, I could only find a Dell S2719DGF as a candidate for the replacement. I Play at 1440p 120FPS on my LG C9 OLED 4K 1200Hz tv because I refuse to be scalped for a new GPU. Even in the monitor space, 1440p was only really available in the sub 30" space, so it seems unlikely that a manufacturer would want to make a 1440p TV that small (given that 32" TVs typically retail for less than $150). I don't have experience gaming on TVs. The higher the quality your initial file is, the better would be finished YT output. However you would have to look at your usecase before considering one of those. It doesn't say on Google's site that it has support for 1440p and the things people say on the internet is a hit or miss, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. It's really incredible, won't buy normal LED TV anymore. If I run it at 1440p with no scaling it gives me a ~31. 1440p is better for competitive games, it is also much cheaper to get 1440p monitors with higher hz. In most games there are no issues, but some games make the window much smaller instead of keeping full screen. Will the TV upscale it to a good image? Just built my first PC recently and wondering if anyone has any suggestions for gaming at 1440p on a 4k OLED TV (C2)? It seems like there are multiple ways to go about it and it's a bit overwhelming. If the monitors and TV had the same kind of panel I'd barely ever play recent demanding games on the 4k screen. I play on a crt because I like the clarity of it while panning. I’m saying the image, upscaled on the monitor from 1080p to 1440p without any processing, looks fuzzy with obvious aliasing With this device much of that goes away and it appears much more crisp, as if the device itself is capable of putting out a proper 1440p image and the images and textures themselves are in that resolution instead of being “zoomed in” on as without the device. 42 inch displays with 4k will look just as sharp as a 27 inch 1440p because the pixel density is essentially the same. No existen las TV de 40" o mas que tengan como maximo la resolucion 2k o 1440p, esto es porque para contenido multimedia es decir, PELICULAS, SERIES y CABLE DE PAGA, no existe contenido en 1440p porque dicha resolucion nunca fue un exito dado que se opaco por el BOOM del 4k. The 1440p at 360hz uses way less performance than the 4k at 240hz, but 1440p one is only marginally sharper and will have worse motion than my crt so I feel like the only real upgrade I am getting is hdr and brightness. In order to do it I need to: set desktop refresh rate of monitor to 60 disable gsync assuming that a game running in 1440 p looks better on a 1440 p screen and not on a 4k? I don't think thats an accurate assumption. 7"diagonal) 1440p is a 34. Consoles are running things at 1440p on 4k displays, and in my experience it hasn't been bad. Desktop resolution in Win10 is set to 2560x1440 (highest PC mode in nvidia control panel that allows me 120hz with my GTX1070) and gaming resolution is also set at 1440p as 4k would be near impossible with So why not 1440p (which is twice 720p)? Well because 720p isn't a thing. Some 1440p monitors like mine (Asus VG32VQ) can take a 4K signal. 1440p looks very close to 4K in games because the image is upscaled to 4K, not just streched to fill out the whole screen. I am planning on buying a 27" 1440p TV. I always play games at 1440p on my 3 years old 55" Samsung RU8000. I have a 6700 xt, I understand that it can run games at native 1440p without problems and at 4k fsr ultra quality. 4090 is a the only card that can push 4K high refresh rate. +400 on the memory) and 32g ram running at 3366 mhz and I still get like 80-100fps on customs lol. I also have 3 Samsung 4K TVs that I connect to a PC and can set them to 1440p resolution @ 30 and 60 hz. Is it best just to set the in game resolution to 1440p and then let the TV do the rest of the work? Dec 17, 2024 · I went from a 1440p 34" LED to a 1440p 34" QD OLED, and while I know the 4k is better, the price was hella good ($450) and I'm super pleased with it. 4 and it stopped working 1440p and got that weird 2048x1152 SDR resolution. Of course, 4k is clearer, but I have no problem with 1440p. For me 3840x1620 works fine at 120hz with HDR, I've tried 3440 x 1440p 120hz, and also works fine with Gsync and HDMI 2. Everything related to gaming on an OLED TV or monitor. Just 10% of Steam users game @ 1440p, and it probably drops to like 2% if you include non-gamers. gsa nfzqe pitfdle caylup dajx qxbn zsng tobx fbugp yijh tidb ckixtepm zrxz krxzvfs pobzu